Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • REC Home
  • Apply
    • REC Services Rate Card & Policies
    • FM engineering & other FCC applications
    • New FM Booster Station
    • New Class D FM Station in Alaska
    • New Low Power FM (LPFM) Station
  • Initiatives
    • RM-11846: Rural NCE Stations
    • RM-11909: LP-250 / Simple 250
    • RM-11952: Translator Reform
    • RM-11843: 8 Meter Ham Band
    • PACE - LPFM Compliance
  • Services
  • Tools
    • Today's FCC Activity
    • Broadcast Data Query
    • Field strength curves
    • Runway slope
    • Tower finder
    • FM MODEL-RF Exposure Study
    • More tools
    • Developers - API
    • Toybox
  • LPFM
    • Learn about LPFM
      • Basics of LPFM
      • Self Inspection Checklist
      • Underwriting Compliance Guide
      • Frequently Asked Questions
      • FCC Rules for LPFM
      • HD Radio for LPFM
      • Transmitters certified for LPFM
      • Interference from FM translators
      • RadioDNS for LPFM Stations
    • 2023 Window REC Client Portal
    • myLPFM - LPFM Station Management
    • LPFM Station Directory
    • Spare call signs
    • REC PACE Program
    • More about LPFM
  • Reference
    • Pending FCC Applications
    • FCC Filing Fees
    • Radio License Renewal Deadlines
    • FCC Record/FCC Reports
    • Pirate Radio Enforcement Data
    • Premises Info System (PREMIS)
    • ITU and other international documents
    • Recent FCC Callsign Activity
    • FCC Enforcement Actions
    • Federal Register
    • Recent CAP/Weather Alerts
    • Legal Unlicensed Broadcasting
    • More reference tools
  • LPFM Window
  • About
    • REC in the Media
    • Supporting REC's Efforts
    • Recommendations
    • FCC Filings and Presentations
    • Our Jingles
    • REC Radio History Project
    • Delmarva FM / Riverton Radio Project
    • J1 Radio / Japanese Broadcasting
    • Japan Earthquake Data
    • REC Systems Status
    • eLMS: Enhanced LMS Data Project
    • Open Data at REC
    • Our Objectives
  • Contact

Breadcrumb

  • Home

Michi on YouTube

Other tools & info

  • Filing Window Tracking
  • Enforcement Actions
  • REC Advisory Letters
  • FAQ-Knowledge Base
  • U/D Ratio Calculator
  • Propagation Curves
  • Runway Slope/REC TOWAIR
  • Coordinate Conversion
  • PREMIS: Address Profile
  • Spare Call Sign List
  • FCC (commercial) filing fees
  • Class D FM stations in Alaska
  • ARRR: Pirate radio notices
  • Unlicensed broadcasting (part 15)
  • FMmap - broadcast atlas
  • Federal Register
  • Rate Card & Policies
  • REC system status
  • Server Status
  • REC Systems Changelog
  • Complete site index

FCC rescinds several LPFM grants in MS, FL, AL and SC

By admin | 10:59 AM EDT, Wed March 12, 2014

The FCC has recently rescinded (cancelled) the grants of fourteen LPFM construction permits in the southern states and returned those applications to pending status.  

An REC evaluation of these applications has shown that many of these applications contained information that may have been forged including siguatures, notary seals and articles of incorporation.  Some applications may have other issues such as incomplete party and NEPA compliance (radio frequency radiation worksheet) issues.

Since these applications have not been dismissed, they can still be amended.  Even if they are dismissed, a Petition for Reconsideration can be filed within 30 days of dismissal and a one time opportunity to correct defects can be made.  

  • Read more about FCC rescinds several LPFM grants in MS, FL, AL and SC

Change to how FM translators are displayed in REC tools

By admin | 9:31 PM EDT, Sun March 09, 2014

In the FCC Rules for LPFM in section 73.807, FM translators are divided under three different "sub-classes" based on the size of their 60 dBu service contour using HAAT calculated from 12 radials.  Each of these three "sub-classes" require a different amount of protection by LPFM stations.  This method for protection was used to address the issue that not all translators are created equal and to provide a distance separation method to protect translators instead of using the customary prohibited overlap model that translators use to protect other translators and LPFM. 

  • Read more about Change to how FM translators are displayed in REC tools

Are you being blocked?

By admin | 11:32 PM EST, Thu February 27, 2014

With the recent Letter of Inquiry sent to a consultant regarding over a dozen of questionable applications, many in the LPFM community know the problem is bigger than just those few applications.  REC has compiled a list of singleton applications specifying that same person as the application certifier and the potential MX applicants they are keeping a channel from.

In other words, if the application on the left was dismissed, the applicants on the right can change to that channel from their current location (pending eligibility for second adjacent waiver based on location, antenna height, operating power and antenna type). 

  • Read more about Are you being blocked?

Statement of REC Networks: Cesar Guel FCC Letter of Inquiry

By admin | 5:47 PM EST, Tue February 25, 2014

On February 24, 2014, the FCC sent a Letter of Inquiry to Antonio Cesar Guel.  The Media Bureau is "investigating potential statuatory and rule violations and related instances of potential misrepresentation and and/or lack of candor" in connection with 14 applications in Tennessee, North Carolina, Nevada, Indiana and Texas.  

  • Read more about Statement of REC Networks: Cesar Guel FCC Letter of Inquiry

Guel Fires Back... REC Responds

By admin | 6:33 PM EST, Thu February 13, 2014

On February 7, the attorney representing Cesar Guel and Hispanic Christian Community Network (HCCN) has filed an opposition against REC's informal objection as well as various informal objections and petitions to deny filed by national organizations, local broadcasters, competing LPFM applicants and concerned citizens. 

In their opposition, HCCN accuses REC of using the IO to block HCCN clients in favor of REC clients, using the informal objections to gain new clients on a contingency basis and that REC's use of the informal objection process was inappropriate and that REC should be sanctioned by the FCC.  In addition, HCCN claimed that they were not served with a copy of the objection.

  • Read more about Guel Fires Back... REC Responds

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 78
  • Page 79
  • Page 80
  • Page 81
  • Current page 82
  • Page 83
  • Page 84
  • Page 85
  • Page 86
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to

REC Essentials

  • FCC.TODAY
  • FCCdata.org
  • myLPFM Station Management
  • REC site map

The More You Know...

  • Unlicensed Broadcasting
  • Class D Stations for Alaska
  • Broadcasting in Japan
  • Our Jingles

Other REC sites

  • J1 Radio
  • REC Delmarva FM
  • Japan Earthquake Information
  • API for developers

But wait, there's more!

  • Join NFCB
  • Pacifica Network
  • MICHI-FM: slightly off the deep end
  • Report a bug with an REC system

Copyright © REC Networks/Riverton Radio Project Association - All Rights Reserved
EU cookie policy

Please show your support by using the Ko-Fi link at the bottom of the page. Thank you for supporting REC's efforts!